If Apple was really concerned about the environment, it would leave China, not the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.  Please look at the pictures below.  The first photo is of Shenzhen, China where Apple makes iPhones.  The second photo is Apple HQ in Cupertino, CA, where the company counts its profits made from the pollution in Shenzhen, China.  Notice the stark difference in air quality?  

Apple told the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in its resignation letter:

"Apple is committed to protecting the environment and the communities we operate in around the world. We strongly object to the Chamber's recent comments opposing the EPA's efforts to limit greenhouse gases. We would prefer the Chamber take a more progressive stance on this critical issue and play a constructive role in addressing the climate crisis. However, because the Chamber's position differs so sharply with Apple's, we have decided to resign our membership effective immediately."

So when will Apple pressure the Chinese government to adopt the Clean Air Act? Isn't actual air pollution in China much worse than the invisible, if not debatable/mythical, problem of U.S. CO2 emissions?

We doubt that Apple has any answers to those questions as Al I-need-cap-and-trade-to-become-the-first-carbon-billionaire Gore sits on its board of directors and, no doubt, cheerlead Apple's resignation from the U.S. Chamber.

If you would like to interview Steve Milloy, publisher of JunkScience.com, strong critic of hypocritical corporate rent-seeking and author of Green Hell: How Environmentalists Plan to Control Your Life and What You Can Do to Stop Them, please give me a call.
Best,
Audrey Mullen
Advocacy Ink
Ph. 703-548-1160